<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.com/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>ASCSP Forums</title>
  <link>http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; ASCSP Forums : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.68</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>forum.ascsp.org/forum/RSS_topic_feed.asp</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title> ASCSP Comments to IRS : ASCSP Commentary of AmeriSouth TC Memo</title>
   <link>http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=39&amp;PID=52#52</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=6" rel="nofollow">ewalsh</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> ASCSP Commentary of AmeriSouth TC Memo<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23&nbsp;Mar&nbsp;2012 at 4:06pm<br /><br />Please click the link below to access pdf.<br><br><a href="uploads/6/ASCSP_Commentary_of_AmeriSouth_TC_Memo_-_3-22-2012.pdf" target="_blank">uploads/6/ASCSP_Commentary_of_AmeriSouth_TC_Memo_-_3-22-2012.pdf</a>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=39&amp;PID=52#52</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Recent court case : ASCSP Provides Comments on Peco Foods case</title>
   <link>http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=38&amp;PID=51#51</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=6" rel="nofollow">ewalsh</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> ASCSP Provides Comments on Peco Foods case<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 21&nbsp;Mar&nbsp;2012 at 9:32am<br /><br />ASCSP Comments on Peco Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner ©<br>Contributing Author– Gian Pazzia, CCSP<br>While the law regarding the binding nature of an asset allocation agreement under IRC Section 1060 is well established, ASCSP notes the specific facts and circumstances of the Peco Foods case in making our recommendations below. In any event, the case suggests that discussions with an ASCSP Certified or Senior Member should be strongly considered before any comparable transaction is completed.<br>More:&nbsp;<a href="uploads/6/ASCSP_Commentary_of_Peco_Foods_Inc._vs_Commissi&#111;ner_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">uploads/6/ASCSP_Commentary_of_Peco_Foods_Inc._vs_Commissioner_FINAL.pdf</a>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=38&amp;PID=51#51</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Recent court case : “Recent court case on cost segregation and apart</title>
   <link>http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37&amp;PID=50#50</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=6" rel="nofollow">ewalsh</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> “Recent court case on cost segregation and apart<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 13&nbsp;Mar&nbsp;2012 at 4:23pm<br /><br />UNITED STATES TAX COURT<br>AMERISOUTH XXXII, LTD., AMERISOUTH TEXAS III, LLC, TAX<br>MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v.<br>COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent<br>Docket No. 21686-07. Filed March 12, 2012.<br>Matthew I. Root and Jennifer S. McGinty, for respondent.<br>MEMORANDUM OPINION<br>HOLMES, Judge: AmeriSouth XXXII, Ltd. bought an apartment complex<br>in 2003 for $10.25 million. The Commissioner argues that with minor exceptions<br>- 2 -<br>the apartment complex is one asset that AmeriSouth must depreciate over 27.5<br>years. AmeriSouth argues that, whatever the apartment complex may look like to an<br>untrained observer, to a tax adept it is not a single asset but a collection of more<br>than 1,000 components depreciable over much shorter periods. It is usually the case<br>that a shorter depreciation period benefits taxpayers. It would certainly benefit<br>AmeriSouth by generating hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of accelerated<br>depreciation deductions. We are tempted to say this is why AmeriSouth throws in<br>everything but the kitchen sink to support its argument--except it actually throws in<br>a few hundred kitchen sinks, urging us to classify them as “special plumbing,”<br>depreciable over a much shorter period than apartment buildings.<br><br>Click link for more:<br><a href="uploads/6/Amerisouth.pdf" target="_blank">uploads/6/Amerisouth.pdf</a>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37&amp;PID=50#50</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title> ASCSP Comments to IRS : ASCSP Comments on Repair vs. Capitalization Temp R</title>
   <link>http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=36&amp;PID=49#49</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=6" rel="nofollow">ewalsh</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> ASCSP Comments on Repair vs. Capitalization Temp R<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06&nbsp;Mar&nbsp;2012 at 11:51am<br /><br />February 24, 2012<br><br>To: Internal Revenue Service<br><br>Re: Comments on the recently issued “Guidance Regarding Deduction and Capitalization of Expenditures Related to Tangible Property” (Repair vs. Capitalization Temp. Regs.)<br>The American Society of Cost Segregation Professionals (ASCSP) represents the largest group of cost segregation professionals in the United States. The issuance of the Temporary Regulations has a direct correlation to the type of analysis that is conducted during a cost segregation study. ASCSP has a unique perspective that comes from a practical understanding of how building related expenditures may affect the use, condition, and life of property being repaired or improved as well as construction estimating and valuation techniques with respect to acquired properties.<br><br><div align="center"><b><font color="#990033">To see the full report click on the link below.</font></b><br></div><br><a href="uploads/6/ASCSP_Comments_&#111;n_Repair_vs._Capitalizati&#111;n_Temp_Regs_02-25-2012.pdf" target="_blank">uploads/6/ASCSP_Comments_on_Repair_vs._Capitalization_Temp_Regs_02-25-2012.pdf</a>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.ascsp.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=36&amp;PID=49#49</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>
